A worldview is a centering meta-paradigm of reality, a unifying cultural consciousness that both underlies and almost always invisibly conditions and controls an individual’s (or a culture's,) way of knowing, seeing, valuing and most importantly, acting in the world. A new worldview always emerges and evolves naturally when the previous worldview no longer adequately solves the most critical new problems of the times that are arising for the individual and the society. Each new worldview expansion provides transcending more effective solutions that simply cannot be seen from within the constraints of the previous worldview. Each new worldveiw encompasses and includes the best of the previous worldviews. Each new worldview eventually causes a great re-alignment of how individuals and cultures view their world. This eventually re-aligns how they act in it. The new Universe Evolutionary Worldview whose core is derived from the science-grounded meta-principles of Evolution 2.0 is such a new worldview.
The term evolution science (or evolutionary science) refers to the collection of disciplines within the sciences (and social sciences) seen as a collective whole.
"The practice of Sustainable Prosperity lifestyles and livelihoods is no longer but another economic or social values option. It has now become a mandatory survival imperative for all of humanity." --Lawrence Wollersheim
Can a new decision in an area that you may have never even considered supercharge your personal evolution and dramatically improve your current situation? Yes it can! Read more and find out how you can reap the benefits...
What is The Highest Objective Purpose of Life and an Individual's Smartest Life Commitment?
The following is a summary of the nearly unstoppable meta-processes, levels, and steps of the core progressive directionality of evolution. (These meta-processes are also known as the core reoccurring meta-patterns, meta-principles, "products," "interests" or intrinsic "values" of universe scale evolution.)
It feels unacceptable to many people even to think of having a cosmology based on science. They misinterpret freedom of thought as requiring a refusal to believe anything. They see fanciful origin stories as spicing up the culture. The problem is, however, that spices, even in the most artful mixture, cannot compensate for the fact that there is no food—no data, no evidence. Such stories are not actually about anything beyond themselves. We are not arguing to throw away the spices but to start with some food and then only use those spices that improve the food at hand. Scientific reality is the food. Aspects of many origin stories can enrich our understanding of the scientific picture, but they cannot take its place.Jordan